Sahelanthropus tchadensis dating techniques Slave chat rooms
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: The video (above), which features interviews with fossil researchers, gives major insights into the way paleoanthropological deductions work, and documents many of the comments made above about australopithecines, for example.
See Q&A: Anthropology for articles on other claimed human ancestors.
A step-by-step look at the key evidences for alleged human evolution. The excitement appears to be NOT because it affords any actual additional evidence that man evolved from apes, but because it is revolutionary for theories of human evolution.
In other words, if we START with the belief that man evolved from apes, it turns some of the previous notions on their head.
That's one of the reasons people can nitpick over its finer points."By the time modern humans evolved 200,000 years ago, the fossil evidence they left behind is extensive, and from 50,000 to 60,000 years ago on, our ancestors left fossils over a large region of the world.
No doubt it will spawn a new orthodoxy, which will be taught with just as straight a face, until the next ‘revolutionary’ discovery (this one is said to have the ‘impact of a small nuclear bomb’.
But we would argue it seems to look like many of the forms of the apes we have seen from that period." Skepticism regarding these famous primate fossil finds seems to call into question the rigor of the scientific process within the field of paleoanthropology.
Wood's and Harrison's paper certainly makes one wonder: Are these isolated incidents of misinterpretation followed by media hype, or does the problem pervade the whole branch of science?
A brief summary of the facts would appear to be as follows: POST-SCRIPT: Not long after the above was written, doubts were already beginning to be expressed about whether this skull was in the human lineage after all.
See Skeptical evolutionists say latest ‘ape-man’ just a female gorilla and Toumai ‘ape-man’ suffers another blow.
19 in the science journal Nature, two paleoanthropologists argue that some recently discovered primate fossils may not be as human as everyone thinks.